复制
收藏
提问
简洁

Administrative agencies establish rules, and then act as both prosecutor and judge in determining whether the rules have been violated. True False

3月前
全网
文档
学术
百科
知识库
时间不限
自动
回答简洁模式
深入研究一些

False.

Administrative agencies do not act as both prosecutor and judge in determining whether rules have been violated. Instead, they use judicial powers granted to them by the legislative branch to conduct administrative adjudication, which includes a variety of agency activities, except for rulemaking, ranging from routine processing of tax returns to final determination of national regulatory policies.34 Administrative adjudication is a process that culminates in the making of an 'order', which is a final disposition of an agency in a matter other than rule-making.6 Additionally, the report by Michael Asimow highlights that every country needs a system of administrative adjudication to resolve disputes between government agencies and private parties accurately, fairly, and efficiently.7 Therefore, administrative agencies play a crucial role in enforcing rules and regulations, but they do not act as both prosecutor and judge in determining rule violations.

你觉得结果怎么样?
What is the role of administrative agencies in rule enforcement?
How do administrative agencies handle rule violations?
What are the checks and balances on administrative agencies?
What is the process of rule-making in administrative agencies?
Can administrative agencies be impartial in rule enforcement?
How is the fairness of administrative agency decisions ensured?

以上内容由AI搜集生成,仅供参考

在线客服