离散元法与卷积神经网络

Significance Accurate simulation of fluids is important for many science and engineering problems but is very computationally demanding. In contrast, machine-learning models can approximate physics very quickly but at the cost of accuracy. Here we show that using machine learning inside traditional fluid simulations can improve both accuracy and speed, even on examples very different from the training data. Our approach opens the door to applying machine learning to large-scale physical modeling tasks like airplane design and climate prediction. Numerical simulation of fluids plays an essential role in modeling many physical phenomena, such as weather, climate, aerodynamics, and plasma physics. Fluids are well described by the Navier–Stokes equations, but solving these equations at scale remains daunting, limited by the computational cost of resolving the smallest spatiotemporal features. This leads to unfavorable trade-offs between accuracy and tractability. Here we use end-to-end deep learning to improve approximations inside computational fluid dynamics for modeling two-dimensional turbulent flows. For both direct numerical simulation of turbulence and large-eddy simulation, our results are as accurate as baseline solvers with 8 to 10× finer resolution in each spatial dimension, resulting in 40- to 80-fold computational speedups. Our method remains stable during long simulations and generalizes to forcing functions and Reynolds numbers outside of the flows where it is trained, in contrast to black-box machine-learning approaches. Our approach exemplifies how scientific computing can leverage machine learning and hardware accelerators to improve simulations without sacrificing accuracy or generalization.

The rapid growth of deep learning research, including within the field of computational mechanics, has resulted in an extensive and diverse body of literature. To help researchers identify key concepts and promising methodologies within this field, we provide an overview of deep learning in deterministic computational mechanics. Five main categories are identified and explored: simulation substitution, simulation enhancement, discretizations as neural networks, generative approaches, and deep reinforcement learning. This review focuses on deep learning methods rather than applications for computational mechanics, thereby enabling researchers to explore this field more effectively. As such, the review is not necessarily aimed at researchers with extensive knowledge of deep learning—instead, the primary audience is researchers on the verge of entering this field or those attempting to gain an overview of deep learning in computational mechanics. The discussed concepts are, therefore, explained as simple as possible.