The poor economic performance of the state forced its residents to live morelifestyle.

The statement provided is incomplete and lacks context, making it difficult to provide a precise answer. However, based on the references provided, it seems to be related to the economic challenges faced by the poor and the role of government in poverty alleviation.

The government's increasing investment has been pivotal in addressing rural poverty and inequality, with county governments playing a significant role in policy adaptation, resource allocation, societal mobilization, and policy enforcement15. The interplay between local government and society is crucial in determining the effectiveness of anti-poverty projects1. The economic lives of the extremely poor involve grappling with various choices, constraints, and challenges234. Despite the welfare state's efforts to ensure economic equality, poverty persists, highlighting the complexity of addressing economic disparities7. Factors such as low nutrition levels, poor education, low economic development, and inadequate infrastructure significantly impact the welfare of impoverished rural areas9.

In summary, while the government plays a crucial role in poverty alleviation, the economic performance of a state can indeed force its residents to adopt a lifestyle characterized by the challenges faced by the extremely poor, as they navigate limited choices and resources.